Advanced Restaking Simulator

Evaluate the benefits, risks, and security characteristics of elastic restaking for validators

Simulator Inputs

Risk Profile

Moderate yields with reasonable security

Total Validator Stake (ETH)

Restaking Degree

Number of Services

Attack Threshold (θ)

Byzantine Service Fraction (f)

Adversary Budget (β in ETH)

Base Annual Yield (%)

Additional Yield per Service (%)

Risk Assessment

Slashing Risk

0.0%

Correlation Risk

0.0%

Overall Risk

0.0%

Risk Rating

Low Risk

Simulation Results

Elastic Restaking Overview

Total Validator Stake

32.0 ETH

Restaking Degree

3.0x

Total Allocated Stake

0.0 ETH

Number of Services

Projected Annual APY

0.0%

Security Rating

Stake Allocation Across Services

Security Analysis

This analysis examines robustness against Byzantine services and adversarial attacks.

Security Metric	Value	Rating
Cryptoeconomic Security	No	Low
β-Robustness	5 ETH	Low
(f,β)-Robustness	Yes	High
Min Stake for Security	0.0 ETH	Good

Security Requirements by Restaking Degree

Security Assessment

The current configuration provides adequate security against both Byzantine services and coordinated attacks. The elastic restaking model with a restaking degree of 3.0 maintains security even if 20% of services become Byzantine.

Rewards & APY Analysis

Service	Allocation	Annual Yield	Annual Reward
TOTAL	0.00 ETH	0.0%	0.00 ETH

Service Allocations and Yields

Stake Allocation

Annual Yield

Rewards Assessment

With a restaking degree of 3.0 across 5 services, the projected annual APY is 0.0%, significantly higher than the base staking yield of 4%. This results in annual rewards of approximately 0.00 ETH on a 32 ETH stake.

Comparison with Regular Liquid Staking

Metric	Regular Liquid Staking	Elastic Restaking	Difference
Annual APY	4.0%	0.0%	+-4.0%
Capital Efficiency	1.0x	3.0x	+2.0x
Security Against Byzantine Services	High		Lower
Slashing Risk	Low	Medium	Higher
5-Year Projected Returns (on 32 ETH)	0.0 ETH	0.0 ETH	+0.0 ETH

Projected Cumulative Returns Over Time

Comparison Summary

Elastic restaking offers significantly higher yields (0.0% vs 4.0%) due to capital reuse across multiple services, but comes with moderately increased security risks. The projected 5-year return is NaNx higher than regular liquid staking.

Advanced Restaking Simulator

Security Assessment

Rewards Assessment

Comparison Summary

Risk Assessment

Latest Blog Posts

Latest Announcements